Analysis of the Narrative Structure of the Rewritten Story of ‎Mathnavi, “Love’s Alchemy”‎

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature Department. Faculty of Humanities, University of Bojnord , Bojnord, Iran

10.22099/jcls.2022.41095.1888

Abstract

Rewriting of the old literary works has considerably flourished in the recent decades. That many literary texts have been rewritten for different age groups of children and young adults testifies to the significance of these texts for these age groups. In rewriting, “after selecting the original old text and simplifying it, fictional spaces are created by establishing elements of time and place for events, and then, new structures are built for the stories by expanding the plot” (Najafi-Behzadi & Safari, 2015: 72).
It is not easy for young adults to read the intricate tales of Mathnavi and understand the protean thoughts of Mowlana; therefore, writers of children and young adult literature undertake the task of rewriting the long stories of Mathnavi in the form of independent shorter stories to help readers find their way in the intricate tales (ibid, 72).
Seyed Ishaq Shojaei has rewritten one of the tales of Mathnavi, “The King and the Maid”, with the new title “Love’s Alchemy” in his collection of stories, The Ladder of the Sun.
 

Keywords


Abbasi, A. (2012). Comparative study of the narrative function of plot in two old and new narratives: The rabbit and the lion from Mathnavi and the predatory lion and the clever rabbit from sweet tales of Mathnavi Ma’navi. Literary History, 70, 123-140 (in Persian).
Abbasi, A. (2014). Applied narratology. Shahid Beheshti University Press  (in Persian).
Barthes, R. (2008). An introduction to narrative structure analysis (M. Ragheb, Trans.). Rokhdad-e Now  (in Persian).
Ebrahimi-Shahed, J. (2008). Rewriting the tales of Mathnavi for adolescents (4 Vols.). Peydayesh  (in Persian).
Genette, G. (1972). Figures III (du Seuil, Ed.). Seuil. 
Mohammadi. M. H. (1999). Methodology of children’s literature criticism. Soroush  (in Persian).
Mohammadi, M. H. & Abbasi, A. (2002). Samad: The structure of a myth. Chista (in Persian).
Najafi-Behzadi, S. & Safari, J. (2015). Studying and analyzing a number of rewritten tales of Mathnavi for adolescents. Kavoshnameh, 31, 71-101 (in Persian).
Nafisi, A. (2008). Simplified Mathnavi for adolescents. Tehran (in Persian).
Okhovvat, A. (1992). The grammar of fiction. Farda (in Persian).
Okhovvat, F. (2004). A look at rewriting Mathnavi Ma’navi for children and adolescents. International Conference on Mowlana’s Thoughts, 396-417 (in Persian).
Payandeh, H. (2015). Opening novel: Iranian novel in the light of literary theory and criticism. Morvarid (in Persian).
Payvar, J. (2001). Studying several decades of rewriting Mathnavi. Book of the Month of Children and Adolescents, 4, 16-22 (in Persian).
Scholes, R. (2004). An introduction to structuralism in literature (F. Taheri, Trans.). Agah (in Persian).
Shaeiri, H. R. (2009). From structuralist sign to sign-discourse semantics. Literary Criticism, 2(8), 33-51 (in Persian).
Shaeiri, H. R. (2016). Sign-discourse of literature: Theory and method of literary discourse analysis. Tarbiat Modarres University Press (in Persian).
Shojaei, S. I. (2007). The ladder of the sun: Rewriting Mathanvi Ma’navi’s stories. Research Foundation for Astan Qods Razavi (in Persian).
Todorov, T. (2003). Structuralist Poetics (M. Nabavi, Trans.). Agah (in Persian).