The Secret for the Long Standing Success of the Poem "Baran"

Document Type : Research Paper

Abstract

 
 

Khosravishakib* J. Dehghanian**

            Lorestan University                   Hormozgan University            
 
Hance Robert Yas believes that the relationship between child literatures to the reader is a statistic and rhetorical application so that completely divides from historical and social context. In art as whole and child literature specifically weight and stress must conduct over formalistic and statistic ingredient of the literary works because the child literature must evaluate and calculates regarding to the manner and style of communication factor. In the field of child literature the “Baran” poem is one of well organized and triumphant poem so that more than forty years established and settled in the elementary book with supremacy and authority. What is the triumph’s secrecy of the poem of “Baran”? Without doubt it is obvious that no literary work can stay on power just based on historical context and its content because with passing the historical background the work will be ineffectual. According to the “baran” it is feasible that components like objective language, coalition ability, episodic structure, rich orchestration, creative ending and … take the success of the poem so that would be discussed in this paper.
 
 
 
*Assistant Professor of  Persian Language & Literature, khosravi_shakib@yahoo.com
** Assistant Professor of  Persian Language & Literature, mirjavad2003@yahoo.com
Received: 11/7/2010            Accepted: 8/11/2011

Keywords

References

احمدی، بابک. (1370). ساختار و تأویل متن. تهران: مرکز.
اسکولز، رابرت. (1383). درآمدی بر ساختارگرایی در ادبیات. فرزانه‌طاهری، تهران: آگاه.
تودروف، تزوتان. (1382). بوطیقای ساختارگرا. ترجمه‌ی محمد نبوی، تهران: آگه.
حق‌شناس، محمدعلی. (1378). آواشناسی. تهران: آگه.
خسروی‌شکیب، محمد. (1388). ساختارگرایی و نقد ادبی. تهران: به‌آوران.
فرای، نورتروپ. (1372). تخیّل آشفته. ترجمه‌ی سعید ارباب شیرانی، انتشارات دانشگاهی.
فالر و دیگران. (1381). زبان‌شناسی و نقد ادبی. ترجمه‌ی محمدجعفر پاینده و خوزان، تهران: نی.
سایپر، ادوارد. (1376). زبان و درآمدی بر سخن‌گفتن. ترجمه‌ی علی‌محمد حق‌شناس، تهران: سروش.
شفیعی کدکنی، محمدرضا. (1376). موسیقی شعر. تهران: آگه.
کروچه، بندتو. (1344). کلیات زیباشناسی. ترجمه‌ی فؤاد روحانی، تهران: بنگاه ترجمه و نشر کتاب.
ویگوتسکی، ل. س. (1380). اندیشه و زبان. ترجمه‌ی حبیب‌اله قاسم‌زاده، تهران: آگاه.
محمدی، محمدهادی. (1378). روش‌شناسی نقد ادبیات کودک. تهران: سروش.
Barthes, Roland ;( 1964). Writing Degree Zero. Translated by Annette lovers and Smith, London: Fontana.
Barthes, Roland. (1977). Image- music- Text. London press.
Laughlin .M.B. (1984). Second – language Acquisition in childhood. Hillsdale. New Jersey: L.E.A. Publishers.
Sapir, E. (1984). Language and Environment. Selected writing of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture and personality .Ed. David G.Mandelbaum. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California press.
Peirce.C.S. (1948). Collected papers. Harvard University published .8 vols.
Morri.c. (1946). Sign. Language and Behaviour. New York published.
Lemon.L.T. (1962). Russian Formalist Criticism. Nebraska University published.
Good, T. L. (1979). Teacher Effectiveness in the Elementary School. Journal of teacher Education, 30 (2).

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 03 October 2012
  • Accept Date: 03 October 2012

Share

How to cite

Statistics