Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 MA in Arabic Language and Literature of University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran

2 Associate Prof in Arabic Language and Literature on University of zabol, zabol, Iran

3 Assistant Prof in Arabic Language and Literature of University of zabol, Zabol, Iran

4 Associate Prof in Persian language and Literature of University of zabol, Zabol, Iran

Abstract

Metadiscourse, a pivotal concept in discourse analysis, refers to linguistic resources used to organize discourse, engage readers, and establish interaction between the writer and the audience. According to Hyland (2005), metadiscourse is categorized into two dimensions: interactive and interactional. Interactional metadiscourse, the focus of this study, encompasses linguistic elements that facilitate the organization of propositional content and guide readers toward the writer’s intended interpretation. These elements include propositions (e.g., additive, transitional, and evidential markers) and frame markers (e.g., structural indicators and textual references). In the context of children’s media, where educational and developmental objectives are paramount, the role of interactional metadiscourse becomes particularly significant. Children’s magazines as dynamic and accessible media serve as vital tools for imparting knowledge, fostering critical thinking, and promoting cultural and ethical values among young readers.
The magazine Al-Hussaini Al-Saghir, published by the Department of Childhood Care and Development at the Imam Hussain Holy Shrine in Iraq, targets children and adolescents with content tailored to their cognitive and emotional needs. Despite the growing interest in discourse analysis within media studies, little attention has been paid to the application of metadiscourse frameworks in children’s magazines, particularly in the Arabic-speaking context. This study aims to address this gap by analyzing the use of interactional metadiscourse markers (propositions and frame markers) in 40 issues of Al-Hussaini Al-Saghir, drawing on Hyland’s (2005) framework. The research seeks to answer the following questions: (1) What types of interactional metadiscourse markers are employed in the magazine? (2) What is the frequency and distribution of these markers? (3) How do these markers contribute to textual coherence and reader engagement in a children’s magazine? By exploring these questions, the study contributes to the understanding of how metadiscourse enhances the educational and communicative efficacy of children’s media.
 
 

Keywords

Abbasi, S. (2017). Analysis of textual cohesion elements in Muhammad al-Fayturi’s Ya’ti al-Aashiqun Ilayk based on Michael Halliday’s approach (Master’s thesis, University of Guilan). [In Persian]
Abi al-Sa’ud, M. (1554/974 AH). Tafsir Abi al-Sa’ud or Guidance of the sound mind to the merits of the Holy Book (Vol. 1). A. Q. A. Ata (Ed.). Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi. [In Arabic]
Abu Zuhra, M. (2001). Zahrat al-Tafasir [Flower of interpretations]. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr al-Arabi. [In Arabic]
Akhlaghi, A. (1997). Structural analysis of Attar’s Mantiq al-Tayr. Isfahan: Farda. [In Persian]
Al-Hussaini Al-Saghir Magazine. (2017). Year 9, Issues 103–116. Iraq: Department of Childhood Care and Development, Holy Hussaini Shrine. [In Arabic]
Al-Hussaini Al-Saghir Magazine. (2019). Year 10, Issues 117–128. Iraq: Department of Childhood Care and Development, Holy Hussaini Shrine. [In Arabic]
Al-Hussaini Al-Saghir Magazine. (2020). Year 11, Issues 129–142. Iraq: Department of Childhood Care and Development, Holy Hussaini Shrine. [In Arabic]
Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
Esmaeili Taheri, E. (2016). Dual form of “adverb” in Arabic: A complement to Dr. Azarnoush’s article on “adverb”. Journal of Language Studies, 7(5), 1–18. [In Persian]
Hassan, A. (1966). Al-Nahw al-Wafi [Comprehensive grammar] (Vol. 1). Cairo: Dar al-Ma’arif. [In Arabic]
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring writing in interaction. London: Continuum.
Ibn Hisham al-Ansari, J. (2009). Mughni al-Labib an Kutub al-A’arib [The eloquent’s guide to the books of morphology]. M. al-Mubarak & M. A. Hamdallah (Eds.). Beirut: Dar al-Fikr. [In Arabic]
Ibn Manzur, J. M. (1984). Lisan al-Arab [The tongue of the Arabs] (Vol. 1). Qom: Nashr Adab al-Hawza. [In Arabic]
Jigareh, M., & Ajdadi Arani, F. (2013). Teaching the identification and translation of the letter “waw” in Arabic texts. Educational Innovations, 12(45), 85–98. [In Persian]
Lotfipour Saedi, K. (1992). An introduction to discourse analysis. Linguistics Journal, 9(17), 109–122. [In Persian]
Maktabat al-Majma’. (2006). Text linguistics between theory and application: Prophetic discourse as a model (Vol. 9). Cairo: Language Sciences. [In Arabic]
Mohammadalinejad, B. (2010). Contrastive rhetoric and discourse analysis in descriptive essays of Persian speakers and Arabic-speaking Persian learners (Master’s thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad). [In Persian]
Nazari, A., & Ansari, N. (2012). Deletion as a cohesive element in Nahj al-Balagha. International Humanities Journal, 20(2), 69–82. [In Arabic]
Pasha Zanoos, A. (2000). A look at the use of “fa” in Arabic. Humanities Journal, 33, 19–36. [In Persian]
Sabihi, M. A. (n.d.). Introduction to text linguistics and applied studies. Lebanon: Dar al-Arabiyya lil-Ulum Nashirun. [In Arabic]
Shibl Muhammad, I. (2007). Linguistics of text: Theory and application (2nd ed.). Beirut: Maktabat al-Adab. [In Arabic]
Taghipour, A. (2016). Comparative study of the functions of “waw” in Persian and Arabic with a focus on Sa’di’s poetry. Journal of Language Studies, 7(3), 19–34. [In Persian]
Taromi, T. (2019). Corpus-based analysis of metadiscourse in Persian research articles across three disciplines and the impact of author gender: Hyland’s framework (2005) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Sistan and Baluchestan]. [In Persian]
Teirani, M. S., et al. (2019). Analysis of the Shaqshaqiyyah sermon based on socio-political context, metadiscourse theory, and rhetorical principles. Linguistics and Khorasan Dialects, 11(8), 173–192. [In Persian]
Yazdani, S. (2013). Comparative study of metadiscourse in English and Persian newspaper reports on the September 11 incident [Master’s thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad]. [In Persian]